1 SEC Release No. IC-23815 (April 29, 1999).
[10946]
April 30, 1999
TO: INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE No. 19-99
SEC RULES COMMITTEE No. 32-99
SECURITIES OPERATIONS COMMITTEE/CUSTODIANS ADVISORY GROUP
RULE 17f-5 WORKING GROUP
RE: COMMISSION PROPOSES NEW RULE ON SECURITIES DEPOSITORIES AND
AMENDMENTS TO RULE 17f-5
______________________________________________________________________________
The Securities and Exchange Commission yesterday proposed amendments to rule 17f-5 under
the Investment Company Act of 1940 and a new rule 17f-7 under the Act to address the custody of
investment company assets outside the US.1 The proposals would establish standards governing the
maintenance of an investment company’s assets with a foreign securities depository. A copy of the
Commission's release is attached.
The comment period on this proposal ends on Thursday, July 15, 1999. If there are
comments that you would like the Institute to consider including in its comment letter, please contact
Robert C. Grohowski by phone at (202) 371-5430, by fax at (202) 326-5841 or by e-mail at rcg@ici.org by
Friday, June 25, 1999.
Background
To address problems with the application of amended Rule 17f-5 to securities depositories, the
Institute and the Association of Global Custodians (“Association”) jointly submitted a proposal to the
Commission in June, 1998. The proposal was revised and resubmitted in February, 1999 in response to
specific concerns expressed by the Commission. The revised joint submission recommended that the
Commission amend rule 17f-5 to provide that the foreign custody manager’s (“FCM”) duty to make a
reasonable care determination with respect to a securities depository would be deemed satisfied if the
FCM determines that the depository meets eight objective criteria and the FCM has no actual knowledge
of information that would indicate that the depository is not in compliance with the basic safekeeping
standards applicable in the relevant market.
Commission Proposals
Instead of following the approach recommended by the Institute and the Association, the
Commission has proposed amendments to rule 17f-5 and a new rule 17f-7 that, together, would govern
2 See, e.g., SEC Release No. IC-23670 (January 28, 1999).
the maintenance of fund assets outside the US. Generally speaking, rule 17f-5 would continue to govern
the use of foreign bank custodians and subcustodians and proposed rule 17f-7 would govern the use of
foreign securities depositories.
Proposed rule 17f-7 would establish four basic standards for foreign depositories to be deemed
eligible to be used by funds, based upon the criteria suggested by the Institute and the Association in the
joint proposal. In addition, the proposed rule would require that one of two “risk-limiting conditions”
be met. A fund could obtain indemnification or insurance that adequately protects it against all custody
risks of using the depository. Alternatively, the fund’s contract with its global custodian could include
provisions that would obligate the custodian to provide the fund or its adviser with an initial risk analysis
of the depository, continuously monitor risks associated with the use of the depository, and notify the
fund or its adviser of material changes in these risks. The global custodian generally also would have to
agree to exercise reasonable care with respect to these and other duties.
Proposed rule 17f-7 would not contain any provisions regarding the delegation of authority
under the rule, under the theory that decisions to maintain assets with the depository should be made by
the adviser, subject to oversight by the fund board, based upon information provided by the global
custodian. Proposed rule 17f-7 would not assign a particular role to the investment adviser or the fund
board in this regard, although the Commission assumes that the adviser generally would determine
whether to place fund assets in a depository under the general oversight of the board.
Compliance with the 1997 amendments to Rule 17f-5, except for the amended definition of
“eligible foreign custodian,” will continue to be suspended until the Commission has completed
consideration of proposed rule 17f-7. As you know, this compliance date had previously been extended
several times, most recently to May 1, 1999.2
Robert C. Grohowski
Assistant Counsel
Attachment
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union