1 SEC v. Lyons, Lit. Rel. No. 15842A; S.D. Calif. No. 98 CV 1471J RBB (August 12, 1998) (the “Complaint”); and In Re
Nicholas-Applegate Capital Management, Release No. IA-1741; File No. 3-9673; Admin. Proc. File No. 3-9673 (August 12, 1998)
(the “Order”).
[10221]
August 21, 1998
TO: COMPLIANCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE No. 23-98
INVESTMENT ADVISER ASSOCIATE MEMBERS No. 22-98
INVESTMENT ADVISER MEMBERS No. 23-98
RE: SEC FILES COMPLAINT AGAINST PORTFOLIO MANAGER FOR PERSONAL
TRADING VIOLATIONS; SANCTIONS INVESTMENT ADVISER FOR
FAILURE TO SUPERVISE
______________________________________________________________________________
The SEC recently filed a complaint against a former portfolio manager at two registered
investment adviser firms for personal trading violations and also settled an administrative action with
one of the firms for failing to supervise his trading activities.1 A copy of the SEC’s administrative
actions are attached and are summarized below.
The SEC’s Complaint charged the portfolio manager with violating the antifraud provisions of
the federal securities laws by failing to disclose his conflict of interest in allocating profitable equity
“day” trades (i.e., buying and selling the same security within the same day) to his personal accounts and
unprofitable trades to his client accounts. The day trades purportedly generated profits of approximately
one million dollars in the portfolio manager’s personal accounts. The Complaint alleges that these
violations occurred: (1) from at least 1991 through July 1993 at an investment adviser firm, which had
employed him as the trader and portfolio manager for its employee profit-sharing retirement plan; and
(2) from August 1993 through August 1995 at another investment adviser firm formerly registered with
the SEC, of which he was a 70% owner, and where he had served in the same capacity for all of the
adviser’s client accounts.
The SEC charged the portfolio manager with: (1) perpetrating the allocation scheme during his
employment with the two adviser firms in violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder; (2) breaching his fiduciary duty to his clients in violation of Sections
206(1) and (2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 by failing to disclose his conflict of interest in
favoring his personal accounts to the detriment of client accounts in allocating day trades; and (3) aiding
and abetting the adviser’s recordkeeping violations of Section 204 of the Advisers Act and Rule 204-
2(a)(12) thereunder by failing to report completely and accurately to the adviser his personal trading
activities. The SEC seeks a permanent injunction, disgorgement of illicit profits, and civil monetary penalties.
2In a related matter, the SEC settled an administrative proceeding with the registered investment
adviser that had employed the portfolio manager to manage and trade the firm’s employee profit-sharing
retirement plan. According to the Order, the adviser: (1) failed reasonably to supervise the portfolio
manager and placed him in a conflict of interest position when it appointed him to manage and trade the
retirement plan without establishing adequate procedures, or an adequate system for implementing such
procedures, to ensure that potential conflicts of interest were properly monitored; (2) failed to institute
adequate procedures to review and supervise the portfolio manager’s personal trading; (3) willfully
violated the recordkeeping provisions of the Advisers Act by failing to maintain accurate and complete
records of the portfolio manager’s personal trading for a substantial number of months from February
1991 through July 1993; (4) maintained procedures that were inadequate to promote compliance by the
portfolio manager with its reporting requirements; and (5) failed to use reasonable diligence to address
the repeated deficiencies in the portfolio manager’s reporting.
In its settlement agreement, the adviser, without admitting or denying the findings, agreed to the
following: (1) a censure; (2) cease and desist from committing or causing violations and any future
violations of Section 204 of the Advisers Act and Rule 204-2(a)(12) thereunder; (3) pay a civil money
penalty of $250,000; and (4) maintain and implement procedures reasonably designed to supervise its
employees with a view toward preventing and detecting the violations noted above.
Barry E. Simmons
Assistant Counsel
Attachment
Note: Not all recipients of this memo will receive an attachment. If you wish to obtain a copy of the
attachment referred to in this memo, please call the Institute's Library Services Division at (202)326-
8304, and ask for this memo's attachment number: 10221.
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union