1 See Memorandum to Board of Governors No. 39-98, Federal Legislation Members No. 12-98, Pension
Committee No. 35-98, Primary Contacts - Member Complex No. 50-98 and Public Information Committee No.
22-98, dated June 11, 1998.
[10154]
July 29, 1998
TO: PENSION COMMITTEE No. 48-98
RE: SOCIAL SECURITY REFORM BILL INTRODUCED AS "TWENTY-FIRST
CENTURY RETIREMENT ACT"
______________________________________________________________________________
In June, the bipartisan National Commission on Retirement Policy, chaired by Senators Judd
Gregg (R-NH) and John Breaux (D-LA), and Representatives Jim Kolbe (R-AZ) and Charles Stenholm
(D-TX) issued an important report on retirement security issues that included proposals for both Social
Security reform and enhancements to other retirement security programs.1 As expected, the Social
Security reform proposals from that report have now been introduced as legislation by the chairmen of
the Commission. The bill, titled the “Twenty-First Century Retirement Act,” has been designated as S.
2313 in the Senate and H.R. 4256 in the House. Other retirement security proposals from the
Commission’s report have not yet been introduced in legislative form.
The bill would require individuals to invest two percentage points of the 12.4 percent OASDI
tax in individual savings accounts modeled after the Federal Thrift Savings Plan (which currently offers
as investment choices an equity index fund, a bond index fund and a government bond fund).
Individuals would be able to determine how their account assets are invested. In the absence of an
individual election, the Social Security Administration would make the investment decision. All
individuals, without regard to adjusted gross income, could make additional voluntary after-tax
contributions to their accounts of up to $2,000 annually.
The Commission report contemplated the possibility that the private sector may have a future
role in managing individual savings accounts. This legislation would establish an Individual Security
Fund Board within the Social Security Administration, which would be responsible for managing the
individual account program, in addition to considering changes to the future management of the
program. The Board would be required to study ways to increase an individual’s investment options, as
well as how to treat rollovers and distributions. The bill requires the Board to report its
recommendations to the President and the Congress within two years of enactment.
Under the legislation, distributions from individual savings accounts would be in the form of an
inflation-indexed annuity. Distributions would be made only at normal retirement age, early retirement
age (as determined under current Social Security rules), or the date on which the individual’s account
assets, plus the traditional Social Security benefit, are sufficient to provide a monthly payment over life
expectancy that is at least equal to the poverty line. To the extent that assets exceed this amount, more
liberal distribution rules would apply.
- 2 -
The legislation also would implement a series of changes to the traditional Social Security benefit
that would reduce the benefit over time. These include: (1) gradually raising the retirement age; (2)
reducing amounts paid to spousal beneficiaries; (3) increasing the number of computation years used to
determine benefits; (4) modifying the formula on which benefits are calculated; and (5) modifying the
cost-of-living adjustment applied to benefits.
Attached are the statute and explanatory materials distributed by the bill’s sponsors.
Russell G. Galer
Senior Counsel
Attachment
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union