April 10, 2013
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
Mr. Gary Barnett
Director
Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
Re: Request for Confirmation and No-Action Relief Regarding Application of Certain Re-
porting Obligations under Part 4 of the CFTC’s Regulations to Subsidiaries of Registered
Investment Companies
Dear Mr. Barnett:
The Investment Company Institute (“ICI”)1 and the Asset Management Group of the Securi-
ties Industry and Financial Markets Association (“AMG”),2 on behalf of our members, respectfully re-
quest that the Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight (“Division”) provide confirmation
and no-action relief regarding the application of certain of the reporting obligations under Part 4 of the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (“CFTC”) regulations to commodity pool operators
(“CPOs”) of registered investment companies (“registered funds”) that trade in commodity interests
through wholly-owned subsidiaries (known as controlled foreign corporations or “CFCs”) that are con-
1 The Investment Company Institute is the national association of U.S. investment companies, including mutual funds,
closed-end funds, exchange-traded funds, and unit investment trusts. ICI seeks to encourage adherence to high ethical stan-
dards, promote public understanding, and otherwise advance the interests of funds, their shareholders, directors, and advis-
ers. Members of ICI manage total assets of $14.7 trillion and serve over 90 million shareholders.
2 The AMG’s members represent U.S. asset management firms whose combined assets under management exceed $20 tril-
lion. The clients of AMG member firms include, among others, registered investment companies, endowments, state and
local government pension funds, private sector Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 pension funds and pri-
vate funds such as hedge funds and private equity funds.
Mr. Gary Barnett
April 10, 2013
Page 2
solidated with the registered fund for financial reporting purposes.3 First, we request that the Division
confirm that registered fund CPOs may defer their reporting obligations under Regulation 4.27 under
the CEA for their consolidated CFCs until the first applicable reporting period ending after the com-
pliance date of the CFTC’s final harmonization rule (“Compliance Date”).4 Second, we request that
the Division provide no-action relief that would permit a CPO of a registered fund that trades in com-
modity interests through a CFC and that files with the National Futures Association (“NFA”) an an-
nual report for the CFC under Regulation 4.22 under the CEA, to include in that report the audited
financial statements of the registered fund that consolidate the CFC, in lieu of separate financial state-
ments of the CFC. Consistent with the timing confirmation requested above, we also request that the
Division confirm that the filing of such an annual report would not apply for periods prior to the fiscal
year of the registered fund that ends after the Compliance Date. In both cases, the requested confirma-
tion or relief is consistent with how these registered funds prepare their audited financial statements
under U.S. GAAP and the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Investment Company Act”).5
We appreciate the Division’s prompt response to our request, as many registered fund CPOs
would otherwise be required to comply with Regulation 4.27 for their CFCs with respect to the first
quarter of this year and, depending on a CFC’s fiscal year, any applicable filing obligations under Regu-
lation 4.22 could be triggered within the next several months.
3 As a result of the CFTC’s amendments to Regulation 4.5 under the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”), many registered
investment advisers that advise registered investment companies must register as CPOs. Although ICI has judicially chal-
lenged amended Regulation 4.5, see Complaint, Investment Company Institute, et al. v. CFTC, Case No. 1:12-cv-00612
(D.D.C. Apr. 17, 2012), it is committed to assisting its members’ efforts to comply with the amended regulation. At the
same time the CFTC amended Regulation 4.5, it also rescinded Regulation 4.13(a)(4), which provided an exemption from
registration for CPOs of private funds. Some registered fund CPOs also advise private funds for which they no longer can
claim a CPO exemption, or with respect to which they already act as registered CPOs. These registered fund CPOs comply
with Regulation 4.27 with respect to their private funds according to the compliance dates specified by the CFTC as appli-
cable to all CPOs, as these obligations are not deferred pending the CFTC’s harmonization rule. See Commodity Pool Oper-
ators and Commodity Trading Advisors: Compliance Obligations, 77 Fed. Reg. 11252 (February 24, 2012); correction notice
published at 77 Fed. Reg. 17328 (March 26, 2012) (“Amendment Release”). The requested relief would, however, apply to
the reporting obligations of these registered fund CPOs with respect to their CFCs.
4 The Division staff has confirmed that the effective date of the harmonization rule will be 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register, and the compliance date will be another 60 days following the effective date. See Amendment Release,
supra note 3.
5 The request is also consistent with a similar request ICI has made to the NFA requesting confirmation that registered fund
CPOs that consolidate the CFC with the registered fund for financial reporting purposes may defer the reporting obligation
under NFA Compliance Rule 2-46 for the CFC until the first applicable reporting period ending after the Compliance
Date. See Letter from Karrie McMillan, General Counsel, Investment Company Institute, to Mr. Daniel A. Driscoll, Execu-
tive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, and Mr. Thomas W. Sexton, III, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary, National Futures Association, dated April 10, 2013.
Mr. Gary Barnett
April 10, 2013
Page 3
Request for Confirmation under Regulation 4.27
While the CFTC has confirmed that CPOs to registered funds that were required to register as
a result of the amendments to Regulation 4.5 under the CEA may defer compliance with reporting ob-
ligations under Regulation 4.27 under the CEA for their registered funds until after the Compliance
Date, it is unclear whether this deferral would also apply to these registered funds’ CFCs.6 We request
that the Division confirm that CPOs of registered funds that consolidate their CFCs for financial re-
porting purposes may delay reporting under Regulation 4.27 for these CFCs until the next applicable
reporting period following the Compliance Date, when reporting may be provided on a consolidated
basis, consistent with how these registered funds prepare their audited financial statements.7
For tax purposes, some registered funds trade in commodity interests through wholly-owned
subsidiaries known as CFCs.8 In most cases, registered funds that trade through such CFCs consolidate
the financial statements of the CFC into the registered fund’s financial statements for financial report-
ing purposes. Consolidation results in the financial statements disclosing the CFC’s investments as if
the registered fund held them directly. This practice is permitted by U.S. GAAP and has been explicitly
permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) staff for SEC reporting purposes.9
More recently, the SEC staff has required registered funds to consolidate wholly-owned subsidiaries
when that subsidiary is an extension of the parent investment company’s operations.10
6 Amendment Release, supra note 3, at 11252 (“Entities required to register due to the amendments to § 4.5 shall be subject
to the Commission’s recordkeeping, reporting, and disclosure requirements pursuant to part 4 of the Commission’s regula-
tions within 60 days following the effectiveness of a final rule implementing the Commission’s proposed harmonization
effort pursuant to the concurrent proposed rulemaking.”) The CFTC has clarified that this delay applies to a registered
CPO’s reporting obligations under Regulation 4.27 with respect to registered funds, stating that this language “suspends
compliance with Rule 4.27 for registered investment companies, pending a final harmonization rule.” Investment Company
Institute, et al. v. CFTC, supra note 3 (Defendant CFTC’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Supplemental Response (Oct. 25, 2012), at 3).
7 Our request under Regulation 4.27 extends to both filings with respect to such CFCs on Form CPO-PQR and Form
CTA-PR, as the same issues are raised with respect to both reporting obligations. We also request that the relief extend to
CPOs and CTAs that are in the process of converting from separate financial reporting to consolidated financial reporting
for the registered fund and CFCs they operate/advise. In particular, the relief should apply to CPOs and CTAs that oper-
ate/advise at least one registered fund that consolidates its CFC for financial reporting purposes, provided that the remain-
ing registered funds’ next audited annual financial statements consolidate their CFCs for financial reporting purposes.
8 Amendment Release, supra note 3, at 11260.
9 See FASB Accounting Standards Codification 946-810-45; Fidelity Investments, SEC No-Action Letter (April 29, 2008).
10 See AICPA Investment Companies Expert Panel Meeting Minutes (September 13, 2012) available at
http://www.aicpa.org/InterestAreas/FRC/IndustryInsights/DownloadableDocuments/INV/INV_EP_Minutes/2012/IN
V_EP_September13_2012_Meeting.pdf.
Mr. Gary Barnett
April 10, 2013
Page 4
Registered fund complexes that consolidate their funds’ CFCs have established financial report-
ing systems that combine the assets, liabilities, income, and expenses of the registered fund and the CFC
for reporting purposes. For CPOs of such registered funds, complying with Regulation 4.27 only with
respect to the CFC prior to the Compliance Date would require the CPO to engage in a manual
process to isolate the CFC’s data. Such a manual process may increase the likelihood of error. Alterna-
tively, the CPO may implement systems changes to isolate the CFC’s data. However, such systems
changes would be in place for only a limited period of time (i.e., until the Compliance Date, at which
time the registered fund could then comply with the reporting requirement on a consolidated basis).
Following the Compliance Date, when the registered fund is required to comply with Regulation 4.27,
additional systems changes would then be required to revert back to reporting on a consolidated basis.
We therefore request confirmation that CPOs of registered funds that consolidate their CFCs
for financial reporting purposes may delay reporting under Regulation 4.27 for these CFCs until the
next applicable reporting period following the Compliance Date.11 As of that date, registered fund
CPOs will be required to also report under Regulation 4.27 for the registered funds that own such
CFCs, and would provide Regulation 4.27 reporting for each registered fund and its CFC on a consoli-
dated basis, which is consistent with how these registered funds provide financial information in their
audited financial statements, as included in annual reports provided to shareholders and filed with the
SEC.
Request for No-Action Relief under Regulation 4.22
We also request that the Division provide no-action relief to permit CPOs of registered funds
that consolidate their CFCs for financial reporting purposes to file with the NFA an annual report for
the CFC, to the extent required by Regulation 4.22, that contains audited consolidated financial state-
ments of the registered fund, in lieu of separate financial statements of the CFC. We request that the
Division permit registered fund CPOs to file the CFC’s first such annual report with respect to the fis-
cal year of the registered fund that ends after the Compliance Date.12 Preparing the annual report in
this manner would be consistent with how these registered funds provide financial information in their
audited financial statements, as included in annual reports provided to shareholders and filed with the
SEC, as discussed below.
Regulation 4.22(c) states that, “[e]xcept as provided in paragraph . . . (c)(8) of this section, each
commodity pool operator registered or required to be registered under the Act must distribute an An-
nual Report to each participant in each pool that it operates, and must electronically submit a copy of
the Report and key financial balances from the Report to the National Futures Association pursuant to
11 To illustrate the timing under our request, if the Compliance Date is August 1, 2013, a quarterly Form CPO-PQR filer
would file its first Form CPO-PQR with respect to the quarter ending September 30, 2013.
12 To illustrate the timing, if the Compliance Date is August 1, 2013, and a registered fund’s fiscal year end is September 30,
the first such annual report would be for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2013.
Mr. Gary Barnett
April 10, 2013
Page 5
the electronic filing procedures of the National Futures Association, within 90 calendar days after the
end of the pool’s fiscal year . . .” Pursuant to Regulation 4.22(c)(8), CFCs are not required to provide
an annual report, either to the registered funds that own them or those funds’ shareholders.13 This re-
quest would apply, however, to the extent that a CPO to a CFC might still have an obligation to file an
annual report containing separate financial statements of the CFC with the NFA.14
Registered funds are required under the Investment Company Act to provide shareholders with
semi-annual and annual reports, and file those reports with the SEC.15 Annual reports to shareholders
must contain audited financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.16 As discussed
above, most registered funds that own CFCs prepare their audited financial statements on a consolidat-
ed basis. In those cases, the registered fund would not prepare separately audited financial statements
for the CFC. Preparing separate audited financial statements for the CFC would require registered
funds to incur unnecessary and redundant costs associated with preparing financial statements for the
CFC, as well as costs associated with an audit of the CFC’s financial statements. It would be costly and
inefficient, and would provide no additional benefit, for the CFTC to require the CPO to such a CFC
to file an annual report with the NFA that includes separate audited financial statements of the CFC,
as the registered fund’s audited consolidated financial statements would include all required financial
information for the registered fund, including the holdings, gains and losses, and other financial state-
ment amounts attributable to the CFC.
For these reasons, we request that the Division provide no-action relief to permit registered
fund CPOs that consolidate their CFCs for financial reporting purposes to file with the NFA an an-
nual report for the CFC that contains audited consolidated financial statements of the registered fund.
We also request that the Division permit such CPOs to file the CFC’s first annual report with respect
to the fiscal year of the registered fund that ends after the Compliance Date. Filing in this manner
would be consistent with how registered funds that consolidate their CFCs prepare their financial
statements for purposes of U.S. GAAP and SEC regulations.
* * * *
13 Regulation 4.22(c)(8) states that for purposes of the annual report distribution requirement, the term “participant” of a
pool does not include a commodity pool operated by the same or an affiliated CPO. See also Division of Swap Dealer and
Intermediary Oversight Responds to Frequently Asked Questions – CPO/CTA: Amendments to Compliance Obligations,
available at http://www.cftc.gov/ucm/groups/public/@newsroom/documents/file/faq_cpocta.pdf.
14 In addition, under Regulation 4.7(b)(3), a CPO relying on that regulation with respect to an “exempt pool” must file with
the NFA an annual report meeting certain requirements within 90 calendar days after the end of the pool’s fiscal year.
CPOs of funds of funds, however, whether relying on Regulation 4.22 or Regulation 4.7(b)(3), have up to 180 days to file
the annual report. See Regulation 4.22(f)(2) under the CEA.
15 See Rules 30e-1 and 30b2-1 under the Investment Company Act.
16 See Rules 3-18 and 4-01 of Regulation S-X.
Mr. Gary Barnett
April 10, 2013
Page 6
We sincerely appreciate the willingness of CFTC staff to address the industry’s concerns. If
you have questions or require further information, please contact me at 202/326-5815, Sarah A. Bessin
at 202/326-5835 or Rachel H. Graham at 202/326-5819 at the ICI, or Tim Cameron at 212/313-
1389 or Matt Nevins at 212/313-1176 at AMG.
Sincerely,
/s/ Karrie McMillan
Karrie McMillan
General Counsel
/s/ Timothy W. Cameron
Timothy W. Cameron, Esq.
Managing Director, Asset Management Group
Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association
/s/ Matthew J. Nevins
Matthew J. Nevins, Esq.
Managing Director and Associate General Counsel,
Asset Management Group
Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association
cc: Amanda Olear, Special Counsel
Michael Ehrstein, Attorney-Advisor
Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Daniel A. Driscoll, Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer
Thomas W. Sexton, III, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
National Futures Association
Jaime Eichen, Chief Accountant
Division of Investment Management
Securities and Exchange Commission
April 10, 2013
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
Mr. Daniel A. Driscoll
Executive Vice President,
Chief Operating Officer
Mr. Thomas W. Sexton, III
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary
National Futures Association
300 S. Riverside Plaza, #1800
Chicago, Illinois 60606-6615
Re: Application of NFA Compliance Rule 2-46 to Subsidiaries
of Registered Investment Companies
Dear Mr. Driscoll and Mr. Sexton:
The Investment Company Institute (“ICI”)1 and the Asset Management Group of the Securi-
ties Industry and Financial Markets Association (“AMG”),2 on behalf of our members, respectfully re-
quest that the National Futures Association (“NFA”) provide confirmation3 regarding the application
1 The Investment Company Institute is the national association of U.S. investment companies, including mutual funds,
closed-end funds, exchange-traded funds, and unit investment trusts. ICI seeks to encourage adherence to high ethical stan-
dards, promote public understanding, and otherwise advance the interests of funds, their shareholders, directors, and advis-
ers. Members of ICI manage total assets of $14.7 trillion and serve over 90 million shareholders.
2 The AMG’s members represent U.S. asset management firms whose combined assets under management exceed $20 tril-
lion. The clients of AMG member firms include, among others, registered investment companies, endowments, state and
local government pension funds, private sector Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 pension funds and pri-
vate funds such as hedge funds and private equity funds.
3 As a result of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (“CFTC”) amendments to Regulation 4.5 under the Com-
modity Exchange Act (“CEA”), many registered investment advisers that advise registered investment companies must regis-
ter as commodity pool operators (“CPOs”). Although ICI has judicially challenged amended Regulation 4.5, see Complaint,
Investment Company Institute, et al. v. CFTC, Case No. 1:12-cv-00612 (D.D.C. Apr. 17, 2012), it is committed to assisting
its members’ efforts to comply with the amended regulation.
Mr. Daniel A. Driscoll and Mr. Thomas W. Sexton, III
April 10, 2013
Page 2
of NFA Compliance Rule 2-46 to CPOs of registered investment companies (“registered funds”) that
trade in commodity interests through wholly-owned subsidiaries (known as controlled foreign corpora-
tions or “CFCs”). Specifically, ICI and AMG request that NFA confirm that CPOs to registered funds
that consolidate the CFC with the registered fund for financial reporting purposes may defer the re-
porting obligation under Compliance Rule 2-46 for the CFC until the first applicable reporting period
ending after the compliance date of the CFTC’s final harmonization rule (“Compliance Date”).4 The
requested confirmation is consistent with how these registered funds prepare their audited financial
statements under U.S. GAAP and the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Investment Company
Act”). The request is also consistent with a similar request ICI has made to the CFTC’s Division of
Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight requesting confirmation that registered fund CPOs may defer
their reporting obligations under Regulation 4.27 under the CEA for their consolidated CFCs until the
first applicable reporting period ending after the Compliance Date.5
We appreciate NFA’s prompt response to our request, as many registered fund CPOs could
otherwise be required to comply with Rule 2-46 for their CFCs with respect to the first quarter of this
year.
Discussion
NFA agreed in discussions with ICI, as memorialized in a letter from ICI dated December 28,
2012,6 that reporting under Compliance Rule 2-46 by CPOs of registered funds that were required to
register as CPOs as a result of the CFTC’s recent amendments to Regulation 4.5 should be deferred
until the Compliance Date. The December ICI Letter, however, did not explicitly address whether re-
4 The staff of the CFTC’s Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight Division has confirmed that the effective
date of the harmonization rule will be 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register, and the compliance date will be
another 60 days following the effective date. See Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors: Compliance
Obligations, 77 Fed. Reg. 11252 (February 24, 2012); correction notice published at 77 Fed. Reg. 17328 (March 26, 2012).
The CFTC has clarified that this delay applies to a registered CPO’s reporting obligations under Regulation 4.27 with re-
spect to registered funds, stating that this language “suspends compliance with Rule 4.27 for registered investment compa-
nies, pending a final harmonization rule.” Investment Company Institute, et al. v. CFTC, supra note 3 (Defendant CFTC’s
Reply to Plaintiff’s Supplemental Response (Oct. 25, 2012), at 3).
5 Letter from Karrie McMillan, General Counsel, Investment Company Institute, to Mr. Gary Barnett, Director, Division
of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, dated April 10, 2013.
6 Letter from Karrie McMillan, General Counsel, Investment Company Institute, to Mr. Daniel A. Driscoll, Executive Vice
President, Chief Operating Officer, and Mr. Thomas W. Sexton, III, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary,
National Futures Association, dated December 28, 2012 (“December ICI Letter”). We note that, at the same time the
CFTC amended Regulation 4.5, it also rescinded Regulation 4.13(a)(4), which provided an exemption from registration for
CPOs of private funds. Some registered fund CPOs also advise private funds for which they no longer can claim a CPO
exemption, or with respect to which they already act as registered CPOs. While these registered fund CPOs would be sub-
ject to Rule 2-46 with respect to their private funds, the requested relief would apply to the reporting obligations of these
registered fund CPOs with respect to their CFCs.
Mr. Daniel A. Driscoll and Mr. Thomas W. Sexton, III
April 10, 2013
Page 3
porting would also be deferred for any CFCs of such registered funds. For the reasons discussed below,
we request that NFA confirm that CPOs to registered funds that consolidate their CFC with the regis-
tered fund for financial reporting purposes may defer the reporting obligation under Compliance Rule
2-46 for the CFC until the first applicable reporting period ending after the Compliance Date, consis-
tent with how these registered funds prepare their audited financial statements.7
Compliance Rule 2-46 addresses the quarterly reporting obligations to NFA of a CPO that is
an NFA member. NFA recently amended Compliance Rule 2-46 to provide that a CPO member that
has any reporting obligation under Regulation 4.27 under the CEA must satisfy its reporting obliga-
tion under Compliance Rule 2-46 for each pool it operates by filing with NFA applicable schedules of
CFTC Form CPO-PQR. Small and mid-size CPOs must also include a schedule of investments with
their quarterly filings, although the threshold under the schedule of investments is revised from 10% of
the pool’s net asset value at the end of the quarterly reporting period to 5% to conform to CFTC re-
quirements. The amendments make certain other changes to the reporting obligation including,
among other things, revising the quarterly filing deadline with NFA from 45 days after the end of each
quarterly reporting period to 60 days after the end of each of the first three quarters of the year, and re-
quiring that a year-end report be filed with NFA within 90 days of the calendar year end. The amend-
ments also add a requirement for NFA members that are CTAs and that are subject to a reporting obli-
gation under Regulation 4.27, to file with NFA CFTC Form CTA-PR, along with certain additional
information, on a quarterly basis. These quarterly CTA filings are required to be submitted within 45
days after the end of each of the first three quarters of the year, with a year-end report required within
45 days of the calendar year end.
In most cases, registered funds that trade through CFCs consolidate the financial statements of
the CFC into the registered fund’s financial statements for financial reporting purposes. Consolidation
results in the financial statements disclosing the CFC’s investments as if the registered fund held them
directly. This practice is permitted by U.S. GAAP and has been explicitly permitted by the Securities
and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) staff for SEC reporting purposes.8 More recently, the SEC staff
has required registered funds to consolidate wholly-owned subsidiaries when that subsidiary is an exten-
7 Our request under Compliance Rule 2-46 also extends to quarterly commodity trading advisor (“CTA”) filings under
amended Compliance Rule 2-46 with respect to such CFCs, as the same issues are raised with respect to both reporting obli-
gations. We also request that the confirmation extend to CPOs and CTAs that are in the process of converting from sepa-
rate financial reporting to consolidated financial reporting for the registered funds and CFCs they operate/advise. In par-
ticular, we request that the confirmation also apply to CPOs and CTAs that operate/advise at least one registered fund that
consolidates its CFC for financial reporting purposes, provided that the remaining registered funds’ next audited annual
financial statements consolidate their CFCs for financial reporting purposes.
8 See FASB Accounting Standards Codification 946-810-45; Fidelity Investments, SEC No-Action Letter (April 29, 2008).
Mr. Daniel A. Driscoll and Mr. Thomas W. Sexton, III
April 10, 2013
Page 4
sion of the parent investment company’s operations.9
Registered fund complexes that consolidate their funds’ CFCs have established financial report-
ing systems that combine the assets, liabilities, income, and expenses of the registered fund and the CFC
for reporting purposes. For CPOs of such registered funds, complying with Compliance Rule 2-46 only
with respect to the CFC prior to the Compliance Date would require the CPO to engage in a manual
process to isolate the CFC’s data. Such a manual process may increase the likelihood of error. Alterna-
tively, the CPO may implement systems changes to isolate the CFC’s data. However, such systems
changes would be in place for only a limited period of time (i.e., until the Compliance Date, at which
time the registered fund could then comply with the reporting requirement on a consolidated basis).
Following the Compliance Date, when the registered fund is required to comply with Compliance Rule
2-46, additional systems changes would then be required to revert back to reporting on a consolidated
basis.
We therefore request confirmation that CPOs of registered funds that consolidate their CFCs
for financial reporting purposes may delay reporting under Compliance Rule 2-46 for these CFCs until
the next applicable reporting period following the Compliance Date.10 As of that date, registered fund
CPOs will be required to also report under Compliance Rule 2-46 for the registered funds that own
such CFCs, and would provide Compliance Rule 2-46 reporting for each registered fund and its CFC
on a consolidated basis, which is consistent with how these registered funds provide financial informa-
tion in their audited financial statements, as included in annual reports provided to shareholders and
filed with the SEC.
* * * *
9 See AICPA Investment Companies Expert Panel Meeting Minutes (September 13, 2012) available at
http://www.aicpa.org/InterestAreas/FRC/IndustryInsights/DownloadableDocuments/INV/INV_EP_Minutes/2012/IN
V_EP_September13_2012_Meeting.pdf.
10 To illustrate the timing under our request, if the Compliance Date is August 1, 2013, a quarterly NFA-PQR filer would
file its first NFA-PQR with respect to the quarter ending September 30, 2013.
Mr. Daniel A. Driscoll and Mr. Thomas W. Sexton, III
April 10, 2013
Page 5
We sincerely appreciate the willingness of the NFA staff to address the industry’s concerns. If
you have questions or require further information, please contact me at 202/326-5815, Sarah A. Bessin
at 202/326-5835, or Rachel H. Graham at 202/326-5819 at the ICI, or Tim Cameron at 212/313-
1389 or Matt Nevins at 212/313-1176 at AMG.
Sincerely,
/s/ Karrie McMillan
Karrie McMillan
General Counsel
/s/ Timothy W. Cameron
Timothy W. Cameron, Esq.
Managing Director, Asset Management Group
Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association
/s/ Matthew J. Nevins
Matthew J. Nevins, Esq.
Managing Director and Associate General Counsel,
Asset Management Group
Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association
cc: Gary Barnett, Director
Amanda Olear, Special Counsel
Michael Ehrstein, Attorney-Advisor
Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Jaime Eichen, Chief Accountant
Division of Investment Management
Securities and Exchange Commission
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union