•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
A.
B.
C.
D.
1.
•
•
•
•
•
2.
3.
E.
1.
2.
3.
F.
A.
•
•
•
•
B.
C.
Investment Company Institute Submission to FTC re: Proposed HSR Rule Changes Project No. P110014
(February 1, 2021)
EXHIBIT A
709
Investment Company Institute
1775 K STREET N. W., WASHINGTON. D C 20006
[2 02) 29 3 7700
November 21, 1975
Honorable Philip A. Hart, Chairman
Subcommittee on Antitrust & Monopoly
Senate Committee on the Judiciary
127 C Street, N. E.
Washington, D. C. 20515
Re: Title V of S. 1284
Dear Senator Hart:
On Friday, October 31, 1975, I met with Bernard Nash, Esq.,
Assistant Counsel to the Subcommittee to discuss various amendments
to Title V of S. 1284. Attached hereto are copies of: (1) our
proposed amendments; (2) a summary of these proposed amendments;
and (3) our suggested language for the Committee report.
We believe that if Title V is amended as suggested and if
the Committee report sets forth the suggested language, Title V
would not adversely affect the investment programs of mutual
funds in the capital markets.
We greatly appreciate the consideration you and your staff
have given this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact us if
we may be of further assistance.
Very truly yours,
Matthew P. Fink
Associate Counsel
Attachments
Investment Company Institute Submission to FTC re: Proposed HSR Rule Changes Project No. P110014
(February 1, 2021)
EXHIBIT B
703
HILL, CHRISTOPHER AND PHILLIPS, P. C.
2000 L STREET, N. W
WASHINGTON, 0. C.20036
G-I ER CHILLER COUNSEL.
JUSEE a. EICUTITELEPHONE 5CC sa-7000
LEE -NSES DEC 2 197F
WRITER'S CIRECT DIAL NUMBER
(202) 452-7040
BCH W E.C .C _UHU ,J
LAW .ca. .November 25, 1975
The Honorable Philip A. Hart
Chairman
Subcommittee on Antitrust and
Monopoly
Senate Committee on the Judiciary
United States Senate
Washington, D. C. 20515
Re: S.1284
Dear Senator Hart:
We are writing on behalf of our client, the Association
of Closed-End Investment Companies ("Association"), with
respect to the provisions of Title V of S.1284.
The Association is a group of 23 investment companies
with assets of over $3 billion. All of the companies are
registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under
the Investment Company Act of 1940. A list of the Apsoci-
ation membership is attached hereto.
Closed-end investment companies, like open-end invest-
ment companies (commonly called "mutual funds"), provide
investors with an opportunity to invest in the securities
markets through professional management of diversified
portfolios. Closed-end companies, however, unlike mutual
funds, neither continuously offer nor redeem their shares.
Instead, their securities are bought and sold in the various
trading markets.
Closed-end investment companies, like other insti-
tutional investors, also buy and sell securities in the
nation's trading markets on a regular basis. Indeed,
such portfolio trading operations lie at the heart of
the investment company business, and any interference
with these activities could seriously affect the public
shareholders of these companies. For this reason, the
704
HILL,CHRISTOPHER AND PHILLIPS, PC.
To: The Honorable Philip A. Hart
November 25, 1975
Page 2
Association has had discussions with Bernard Nash, Esquire,
Assistant Counsel to your Subcommittee on Antitrust and
Monopoly, concerning the need for certain amendments to
Title V of 5.1284.
The Association believes amendments are necessary
to avoid a drastic and entirely unintended effect of the
bill on the routine portfolio trading operations of closed-
end investment companies and other institutional investors.
Since such investors generally do not invest for the pur-
poses of control, their portfolio transactions do not raise
the underlying antitrust problems to which Title V is di-
rected. Nevertheless, Title V of S.1284, as reported by
the Subcommittee to the full Committee, does not contain
a statutory exemption for those transactions and requires
a number of other clarifying changes.
We enclose herewith a draft of proposed amendments
which would effect the necessary changes to Title V for
these limited purposes. The proposed amendments are
similar to those discussed with Mr. Nash, except that
we have added to the proposed definition of "voting
securities" the phrase:
"or, with respect to unincorporated issuers,
persons exercising similar functions"
We also enclose, for your consideration, a discussion of
a problem relating to the determination of ten percent
ownership which we believe should be mentioned in the
Committee Report as requiring resolution by administrative
rule-making.
We believe that if Title V of S.1284 were amended as
proposed, and the suggested administrative action were
taken by the Federal Trade Commission, the bill would not
adversely affect the portfolio operations of closed-end
investment companies and other institutional investors
similarly situated. In that event, the Association of
Closed-End Investment Companies would have no objection
to Title V of the bill.
The Association appreciates the thoughtful consider-
ation given by Mr. Nash to the problems raised by Title V
705
HILL, CHRISTOPHER AND PHILLIPs. P.C.
TO: The Honorable Philip A. Hart
November 25, 1975
Page 3
of S.1284. If you or your staff have any questions con-
cerning this matter please do not hesitate to call upon
us.
Sincerely yours,
Richard M. Phillips
Enclosures
706
64
1 material as the Federal Trade Commission shall by general
2 regulation prescribe, after consultation with the Assistant
3 Attorney General, and after notice and submission of views,
4 pursuant to section 553 of title 5, United States Code.
5 "(4) (A) The Federal. Trade Commission, after con-
6 sultation with the Assistant Attorney General, is authorized
7 and directed to define the terms used in this section, prescribe
8 the content and form of reports, by general regulation except
9 classes of persons and transactions from the notification
10 requirements thereunder, and to promulgate rules of general
11 or special applicability as may be necessary or proper to the
12 administration of this section, insofar as such action is not
13 inconsistent with the purposes of this section, after notice and
.14 submission of views, pursuant to section 553 of title 5, United
15 States Code.
following
16 "(B) The /regulations--arcepting classes of -ersons-nd
are exempt from the notification requirements of
17 transactions/shl-inlude,--b-eed-nt-be-limd-to-he
this section:
18 following-esceptionu--
19 "(A) goods or realty transferred in the ordinary
20 course of business;
21 "(B) bonds, mortgages, deeds of trust, or other
which are not voting secuiities;
22 obligations/with4avetin4aqight
23 "(C) interests in a corporation at least 50 per
24 centum of the stock of which is already owned by the
25 acquiring person or a wholly-owned subsidiary thereof;
707
65
1 "(D) transfers to or from a Federal agency or a
2 State or political subdivision thereof;
3 " (E) transactions exempted from collateral attack
4 under section 7 of this Act if approved by a Federal
5 administrative or regulatory agency: Provided, That
6 duplicate originals of the information and documentary
7 material filed with such agency shall be contemporaneous-
8 ly filed with the Federal Trade Commission and the As-
9 sistant Attorney General;
10 "(F) transactions which require agency approval
11 under section 18(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance
12 Act (12 U.S.C. 1828(c)), as amended, or section 3 of
13 the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C.
14 1842), as amended;
15 "(0) acquisitions, solely for the purpose of invest-
voting securities, if at the time of such acquisition the
16 ment, of steek-who.-the-ock acquired or held dolt not securiti
outstanding voting securities of the issuer;
17 exceed 10 per centum of thehoIvting--ights;
voting securities if, at the time of such acquisition,
18 "(H) acquisitions offatele-tmbr the Wtook-acquired
do ecurities
19 -loes/ not increase, directly or indirectly, the acquiring
outstanding voting .securities of the issuer;
20 person's-r-p&rsons' share of poligx .gaanL..
21 "(1) acquisitions, solely for the purpose of invest-
voting securities pursuant to a plan of reo ganization or dissolut
22 ment, of/ assets, other than voting, sa"k or other voting
securities
23 share capital, by any bank, banking association, trust
investment company
24 company,/or insurance company, in the ordinary course
25 of its business.
"(C) For the purpose of subsection (b)(4)(B) of this section
'voting security' means any security presently entitling the owner
or holder thereof to vote for the election of directors of a companygy
W 44 - IL4v £"A%.prMrftd #'CrerS, fLV4ceiset -"ecC.Wc,S*
708
AMERICAN
LIFE INSURANCE
ASSOCIATION
1730 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 WILLIAM B. HARMAN, JR.
(202) 872- 8750 ex1cTive VIce massesNT
December 3, 1975
DC51975
The Honorable Philip A. Hart
Chairman, Subcommittee on Antitrust
and Monopoly
Committee on the Judiciary
United States Senate
Washington DC 20510
Dear Mr. Chairman:
In accordance with your request, we have reviewed the exemptive
amendments to Title V of S. 1284 included in the bill as reported on July 28
by the Antitrust and Monopoly Subcommittee. We also have reviewed the
additional exemptive provisions proposed by the Investment Company
Institute on behalf of the mutual fund industry and by an association of
closed-end funds.
Our Association represents 379 companies, with assets of $254
billion, including at year-end 1974 $96. 6 billion in corporate debt securities
and $21. 9 billion in corporate equity securities. On behalf of our member-
ship, we very much appreciate the consideration and cooperation afforded
by the Subcommittee and its staff in evaluating our concerns about the im-
pact of Title V on capital formation by industry in general and, specifically,
on our investment function. We are satisfied that inclusion in Title V of
the exemptions reported by the Subcommittee coupled with those proposed
by the mutual fund industry will assure that Title V does not adversely af-
fect the capital markets or the ability of the life insurance industry to
continue its investment function in the capital markets.
Again, our appreciation for the Subcommittee's effort in under-
standing our concerns.
Sincerely yours,
William B. Harman, Jr.
WBH:ecn
Investment Company Institute Submission to FTC re: Proposed HSR Rule Changes Project No. P110014
(February 1, 2021)
EXHIBIT C
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union