October 7, 2019
Mr. Shayne Kuhaneck
Acting Technical Director
Financial Accounting Standards Board
401 Merritt 7
P.O. Box 5116
Norwalk, CT 06856-5116
Re: Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848)
File Reference No. 2019-770
Dear Mr. Kuhaneck:
The Investment Company Institute1 appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposed
accounting standards update, Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial
Reporting. The proposal would provide temporary optional relief to ease the potential burden in
accounting for, and recognizing the effects of, reference rate reform on financial reporting.
Under the proposal, an entity could choose not to apply certain modification accounting
requirements in US GAAP to contracts, including financial instruments, affected by reference
rate reform, if certain criteria are met. An entity could, if it meets the specified criteria, present
and account for a modified contract as a continuation of the existing contract. The temporary
relief would be effective upon issuance of final guidance and would not apply to contract
modifications made after December 31, 2022.
We agree that the application of existing accounting standards on modifications could be costly
and burdensome due to the significant volume of affected financial instruments and the
compressed time frame for making modifications due to reference rate changes. We support the
proposed temporary optional relief that would allow an entity to account for and present a
modified financial instrument as a continuation of the existing instrument rather than
derecognition of the modified instrument and initial recognition of a new financial instrument.
We believe the proposed temporary optional relief will simplify the analysis to be performed and
facilitate the transition to alternative reference rates.
1 The Investment Company Institute (ICI) is the leading association representing regulated funds globally, including
mutual funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), closed-end funds, and unit investment trusts (UITs) in the United
States, and similar funds offered to investors in jurisdictions worldwide. ICI seeks to encourage adherence to high
ethical standards, promote public understanding, and otherwise advance the interests of funds, their shareholders,
directors, and advisers. ICI’s members manage total assets of US$23.4 trillion in the United States, serving more
than 100 million US shareholders, and US$7.1 trillion in assets in other jurisdictions. ICI carries out its international
work through ICI Global, with offices in London, Hong Kong, and Washington, DC.
Disclosure
The proposal would require entities to disclose the nature of and reason for electing the optional
relief in each interim and annual financial statement period in the fiscal year of application. The
proposal indicates that the Board is considering additional qualitative and quantitative
disclosures relating to reference rate reform. Qualitative disclosures could include a description
of management’s approach and its progress on addressing exposure to discontinued reference
rates. Quantitative disclosures could include the percentage of instruments by type that
adequately contemplate the discontinuance of the reference rate and the percentage of
instruments that do not and would need some degree of additional negotiation. The proposal
requests comment on what quantitative and qualitative disclosures would help financial
statement users understand the reporting entity’s contracts or holdings that are affected by
reference rate reform.
SEC registered investment companies disclose their portfolio holdings four times per year. Such
disclosures include the name of the issuer and description of each security held, the principal
amount or number of shares, and the period end fair value. For variable rate securities the
description would include the reference rate and spread, and the period end rate.2 Accordingly,
investors can easily assess the proportion of the fund’s securities affected by reference rate
reform. To the extent the Board requires disclosure beyond the proposed nature of and reason for
electing the optional relief, we encourage the Board to follow a management approach, enabling
the entity to describe its process for assessing and responding to reference rate reform and would
avoid requiring specific quantitative disclosures. Such disclosures could discourage entities from
electing into the optional relief.
******************************
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the proposal and would be pleased to
provide any additional information you may require. If you have any questions on our comments
or recommendations, please contact the undersigned at 202/326-5851 or smith@ici.org.
Sincerely,
Gregory M. Smith
Senior Director
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union