April 19, 2018
John Smith
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control
Department of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20220
Re: Issues and Impact of Recent Sanctions Against Russia on Regulated Funds
Dear Mr. Smith:
On behalf of the Investment Company Institute (“ICI”),1 I write to request that the Office of Foreign
Assets Control (“OFAC”) issue guidance to address certain questions and concerns raised by our
members in connection with the economic sanctions imposed on April 6, 2018 on several Russian
oligarchs and their affiliated entities.
On April 6, 2018, OFAC imposed sanctions on a number of Russian oligarchs, Russian government
officials, officers of Russian state-owned enterprises, and related companies and added these individuals
and entities to the List of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (“SDN List”).2 OFAC
also issued two general licenses intended to minimize disruptions to US persons, partners and allies.
General License 12 authorizes transactions and activities ordinarily incident and necessary to
the maintenance or wind down of operations, contracts, or other agreements involving the twelve
1 ICI is the leading global association of regulated funds, including mutual funds, exchange-traded funds, closed-end funds,
and unit investment trusts. Our members serve more than 100 million US shareholders and manage total assets of US$21.9
trillion in the United States and US$7.5 trillion in assets in other jurisdictions. ICI seeks to encourage adherence to high
ethical standards, promote public understanding, and otherwise advance the interests of funds, their shareholders, directors,
and advisers. ICI is strongly committed to compliance with all applicable laws, including US economic sanctions laws and
regulations. ICI carries out its international work through ICI Global, with offices in London, Hong Kong, and
Washington, DC.
2 See “Treasury Designates Russian Oligarchs, Officials, and Entities in Response to Worldwide Malign Activity” (April 6,
2018), available at https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sm0338.
Letter to Mr. John Smith
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control
April 19, 2018
Page 2 of 5
oligarch-related SDN companies and their subsidiaries. General License 13 authorizes transactions and
activities ordinarily incident and necessary to divest or transfer debt, equity, or other holdings in three
publicly-traded SDN companies to a non-US person, or to facilitate the transfer of debt, equity, or
other holdings in such companies by a non-US person to another non-US person.
The recent sanctions have had a tremendous impact on the holdings and activities of our members that
invest in instruments that are now covered by these sanctions. We thank OFAC for the guidance on
the new sanctions that it has provided to date to market participants. Although the guidance has been
helpful, it has not addressed a number of questions and issues faced by our members. We urge OFAC
to issue additional guidance with respect to the following issues to help our members comply with the
new sanctions as soon as practicable:
1. In other contexts (i.e., the Russian Sectoral Sanctions Identification List (“SSI List”) and
sanctions applicable to Venezuelan government bonds), OFAC issued FAQs and/or general
licenses addressing the applicability of sanctions to derivative transactions related to securities of
sanctioned persons. We request that OFAC issue a similar FAQ confirming that US persons are
permitted to purchase or sell swaps or other derivatives linked to securities issued by the SDNs,
and to engage in transactions incident to such purchase or sale. These transactions should be
permitted as they do not involve the transfer or other dealing in any property or interests in
property of the sanctioned entities. In the context of Venezuela sanctions, OFAC issued an FAQ
(No. 524) expressly stating that buying, selling, or otherwise dealing in a derivative that references
a Venezuelan bond is a transaction related to the bond itself, but such derivative transactions were
permitted when related to a bond covered by the relevant Venezuelan general license. With
respect to derivatives linked to securities of Russian SSI entities, OFAC addressed the issue by
issuing a general license authorizing all transactions involving derivative products whose value is
linked to an underlying asset that constitutes prohibited debt or equity.
a. If OFAC takes the view that transactions in derivatives related to securities of sanctioned
persons, or collateral posted by a counterparty relating to such securities, are prohibited, we
request that OFAC issue an FAQ confirming that winding down such derivatives is
authorized under General License 12 or 13. These activities should be authorized because
they would permit US persons to limit their exposure to potential dealings in the future
that indirectly involve sanctioned persons.
Letter to Mr. John Smith
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control
April 19, 2018
Page 3 of 5
2. General License 13 only authorizes the divestiture or sale of covered securities to non-US persons.
In market trades, however, funds as sellers of securities do not have knowledge of the person who
is ultimately purchasing the securities. Moreover, US persons are prohibited from purchasing
such securities, which provides some reassurance that they would not be purchasers in market
trades. As a consequence, we request that OFAC issue an FAQ stating that US sellers will be
considered to be in compliance with the terms of General License 13 as long as they are not
knowingly selling to a US person.
3. We ask OFAC to issue an FAQ clarifying whether reports under General License 13 or any other
provision are required to be filed in cases where trades in sanctioned securities were executed
prior to the announcement of sanctions, but settled after sanctions were imposed. No reports
should be required because the trades were initiated prior to the imposition of sanctions.
4. US persons who continue to hold securities of sanctioned Russian issuers may receive dividend,
interest, or principal payments associated with such holdings. In certain cases, a now-sanctioned
entity might have announced a dividend payment prior to the imposition of sanctions that was
not paid until after sanctions were imposed. Questions have been raised regarding whether US
persons are permitted to even accept such payments or if such activity would constitute a
prohibited transaction or dealing with the SDN and, if so, whether the payments can be accepted
only during the period of General License 13. We believe that funds should not be required to
block such payments because once they are made, the SDN no longer has an interest in such
payments. We therefore ask OFAC to issue an FAQ (1) confirming that US persons are
permitted to accept dividend, interest, or principal payments related to securities issued by SDNs,
regardless of whether such payments are received prior to the expiration of General License 13 or
thereafter, and (2) clarifying whether any report is required to be filed with OFAC in connection
with the receipt of such payments. Permitting US persons to receive such payments would be in
the US foreign policy interest as it requires SDNs to pay out money rather than increasing their
holdings. If US persons are not permitted to accept such payments, the SDNs will be able to
retain the additional value saved by not having to make the payments.
5. In a repurchase agreement transaction, one party typically receives interest on the collateral
provided to another party for a transaction. We request that OFAC issue an FAQ confirming
that the receipt of interest in connection with an underlying security of a sanctioned person
would be permitted under General License 13. For example, if Party A transfers an SDN security
as collateral to Party B in exchange for cash, when the transaction is completed, Party B would
Letter to Mr. John Smith
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control
April 19, 2018
Page 4 of 5
receive cash plus interest in return. We request that OFAC confirm that the transfer of the SDN
security and receipt of the cash and interest is permitted, and also clarify whether a report would
need to be filed to OFAC in connection with such activity.
6. We understand that Sulzer AG no longer is considered to be a sanctioned entity based on
guidance provided by OFAC on April 13, 2018. For US persons that blocked Sulzer shares
between April 6 and April 13, we request that OFAC issue an FAQ clarifying whether such
persons need to submit a report of blocked property to OFAC within ten business days of the
blocked transaction. Given that the shares are now unblocked and OFAC has confirmed the
unblocking to the industry at large, such reporting would appear to impose an unnecessary
burden on both US persons and OFAC.
7. In addition to the guidance provided in FAQ 574, we request that OFAC either supplement that
FAQ or issue a new FAQ addressing whether a non-US person who purchases SDN securities
(and/or any non-US persons involved in settling the trades) would be potentially liable under Sec.
226 or Sec. 228 of the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act having
facilitated a “significant transaction” or “significant financial transaction” for or on behalf of an
SDN. In our view, such activities should not be viewed as facilitating a “significant transaction”
or “significant financial transaction” for or on behalf of the SDNs as the SDNs have no direct
involvement in the secondary market trades at issue.
8. We request that OFAC issue an FAQ clarifying whether US funds that have engaged in securities
lending transactions with respect to securities issued by an SDN are authorized to recall such
securities without violating US sanctions. The process of recalling the securities should be
authorized as an activity incident to the US fund’s obligation to block the SDN securities. This
authorization would be consistent with US foreign policy goals because US funds will be unable
to fulfill their obligations under US sanctions to block the securities if US funds cannot recall the
securities and non-US persons are not permitted to return the shares to the US fund lender.
9. General License 12 expressly authorizes activities related to the twelve named companies and “any
other entity in which one or more of the above persons own, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or
greater interest.” General License 13, however, only authorizes activities related to the three
named companies and does not contain any language regarding entities in which such named
companies own a 50 percent or greater interest. We ask OFAC to issue an FAQ – or amend
General License 13 – to confirm that General License 13 also authorizes activities to divest or
Letter to Mr. John Smith
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control
April 19, 2018
Page 5 of 5
transfer holdings in any other entity in which one or more of the listed persons own, directly or
indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest.
10. Finally, we request an FAQ clarifying whether US funds that have lent SDN securities to US or
non-US persons are authorized to accept posted collateral and payments related to dividends and
interest paid by SDN issuers. Such payments should be authorized as they do not involve
additional transactions in the underlying securities and the ability of US persons to accept such
payments will minimize the impact of the recent sanctions on US person investors while
remaining consistent with US foreign policy interests.
The issues described above are those that have been identified by our members as most pressing;
additional questions and issues may arise as we continue to discuss the impact of the recent measures
with members. We also would like to discuss these requests with OFAC and any other agencies
involved in identifying sanctions targets and assessing the impact of US sanctions regarding Russia.
We sincerely appreciate your attention to this matter and look forward to hearing from you at your
earliest convenience. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at
202-326-5876 or jennifer.choi@ici.org or Eva Mykolenko, Associate Chief Counsel – Securities
Regulation, at 202-326-5837 or emykolenko@ici.org.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Jennifer S. Choi
Jennifer S. Choi
Chief Counsel, ICI Global
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union