By Electronic Delivery
August 14, 2017
Hon. David Kautter William Paul
Assistant Secretary, Tax Policy Acting Chief Counsel
U.S. Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20220 Washington, DC 20224
RE: Proposed Regulations on Centralized
Partnership Audit Regime (REG-136118-
15)
Dear Mr. Kautter and Mr. Paul:
The Investment Company Institute1 thanks the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and the
Treasury Department for reflecting our comments when drafting the proposed regulations
implementing the new partnership audit regime enacted as part of the Bipartisan Budget Act of
2015.2 Specifically, the proposed regulations clarify that regulated investment companies
(“RICs”) and real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) may use the deficiency dividend procedures
under section 860 when a RIC or REIT is a partner in a partnership that is subject to audit under
section 6225 or 6226. We believe that the proposed regulations appropriately permit RICs to use
the deficiency dividend procedures, as clearly was intended by Congress when enacting the new
partnership audit rules.3 We thus encourage the IRS and Treasury Department to adopt these
portions of the regulations as proposed. We also echo others’ comments that the IRS should
provide extensions of the 270-day period under the section 6225 modification process as a matter
of course. Finally, we encourage the government to promulgate regulations permitting upper-tier
partners to use the method under section 6226 with respect to an imputed underpayment that has
been passed through to the partnership from a lower-tier partnership.
1 The Investment Company Institute (ICI) is the leading association representing regulated funds globally, including
mutual funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), closed-end funds, and unit investment trusts (UITs) in the United
States, and similar funds offered to investors in jurisdictions worldwide. ICI seeks to encourage adherence to high
ethical standards, promote public understanding, and otherwise advance the interests of funds, their shareholders,
directors, and advisers. ICI’s members manage total assets of US$20.0 trillion in the United States, serving more
than 95 million US shareholders, and US$6.0 trillion in assets in other jurisdictions. ICI carries out its international
work through ICI Global, with offices in London, Hong Kong, and Washington, DC.
2 See Institute Letter to William Wilkins and Tom West, dated October 24, 2016.
ICI Letter
August 14, 2017
Page 2 of 4
Application of Section 860
Under section 6225, a partnership’s imputed underpayment amount may be reduced by
taking into account the impact of the underlying adjustments on the partners’ reviewed-year
returns. The proposed regulations permit a RIC or a REIT to pay a deficiency dividend in
respect of the adjustment to generate a dividends paid deduction for the reviewed year to avoid
any RIC or REIT-level tax, other than the interest charge under section 860 and any share of
penalties imposed.
Alternatively, section 6226 provides procedures under which a partnership may send
adjusted partnership statements to the partners for the reviewed year. Those partners must then
include in their adjustment-year tax return an amount determined by calculating the amount by
which their tax liability would have increased in the reviewed year, and any subsequent years, if
that partner’s allocable share of the adjustments had been properly taken into account in the
reviewed year. The proposed regulations permit a RIC or REIT that receives such an adjusted
partnership statement to use the deficiency dividend procedures under section 860 to generate a
dividends paid deduction for the adjusted year (and any subsequent years that may be affected),
avoiding tax at the RIC or REIT-level.
As the Institute requested, the proposed regulations appropriately clarify the ability of
RICs to use the deficiency dividend procedures under both sections 6225 and 6226. Further, the
proposed regulations properly provide that RICs only will be subject to interest under section
6226 on any correction amount determined after subtracting any deficiency dividend deduction
from the adjustments taken into account by the RIC. In other words, a RIC should not be subject
to double interest under sections 860 and 6226 on the same amounts. Finally, we agree that the
proposed regulations properly treat a RIC as a C corporation in determining whether a
partnership is an eligible partnership under section 6221(b) because it has 100 or fewer partners
that are all eligible partners. For these reasons, we encourage the IRS and Treasury Department
to adopt these portions of the proposed regulations as written.
Deficiency Dividends under Section 6225
As required by Section 6225(c), the proposed regulations provide that a partnership may
request modification of an imputed underpayment if a reviewed year partner files one or more
amended returns that take into account all or a portion of the adjustment and pay any tax due.
Pursuant to the Secretary’s regulatory authority under section 6225(c), the proposed regulations
provide that, if a RIC or REIT is a partner in a partnership and pays a deficiency dividend under
section 860 with respect to the adjustment, the deficiency dividend will be treated similar to an
amended return. Accordingly, the partnership can take into account the payment of the
deficiency dividend and the associated dividends paid deduction in its request for modification
reducing the amount of an imputed underpayment. A partnership must provide any information
with respect to a request for modification within 270 days of the notice of proposed partnership
adjustment (NOPPA), unless the IRS grants an extension. The preamble to the proposed
regulations asks whether these provisions adequately allow RICs and REITs to use the
modification process.
ICI Letter
August 14, 2017
Page 3 of 4
It certainly is not ideal for a RIC to pay a deficiency dividend with respect to an amount
that may not be final. To reduce the possibility that a deficiency dividend is paid under this
modification process with respect to an adjustment that is later modified, we agree with the
suggestion of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) that the
IRS should grant extensions of the 270-day period as a matter of course until all relevant issues
have been resolved with the Appeals division of the IRS.4
Tiered Partnerships
The Institute agrees with others who have recommended the ability of an upper-tier
partnership to pass through to its partners an adjustment from a lower-tier partner under section
6226. We believe that such a rule satisfies the intent of the new partnership audit rules without
unfairly harming lower-tier partners by denying them the benefits of the alternative rules in
section 6226. Although the proposed regulations reserve on this issue, we encourage the IRS
and Treasury Department to provide guidance permitting the use of section 6226 in tiered
partnerships. In particular, an upper-tier RIC in a tiered partnership also should be permitted to
use the deficiency dividend procedures under section 860 with respect to the amount passed
through from the lower-tier partnership.
* * *
The Institute believes that the proposed regulations appropriately permit RICs to use the
deficiency dividend procedures under section 860 when a RIC is a partner in a partnership
subject to audit under section 6225 or 6226. We thus urge the IRS and Treasury Department to
adopt those portions of the proposed regulations in the final regulations. We also encourage the
government to grant extensions to the 270-day period under section 6225 as a matter of course
and to promulgate regulations permitting the use of section 6226 in tiered partnerships.
Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions regarding the application of
the proposed regulations to RICs. I can be reached at (202) 371-5432 or kgibian@ici.org.
Sincerely,
/s/ Karen L. Gibian
Karen Lau Gibian
Associate General Counsel, Tax Law
ICI Letter
August 14, 2017
Page 4 of 4
cc: Michael Novey
Drita Tonuzi
Jennifer Black
Curt Wilson
Helen Hubbard
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union