January 18, 2008
Ms. Nancy M. Morris
Secretary
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE
Washington, D.C. 20549-1090
Re: Proposed Rule Change to Create Exception to Principal Approval
Requirements for Certain Filed Sales Material (File No. SR-FINRA-
2007-020)
Dear Ms. Morris:
The Investment Company Institute1 supports the proposed change to NASD Rule 2210 to
modify the requirement for approval of investment company sales material by principals at
intermediary firms.2 We commend FINRA for taking the initiative to examine the costs and benefits of
Rule 2210’s principal approval requirement and determining to modify it in a way that should alleviate
burdens on some intermediary firms without compromising investor protection.3 The Institute has
consistently urged regulators to ensure that regulatory costs are proportionate to their benefits by,
among other things, examining existing requirements and thinking creatively to achieve appropriate
protections in the least burdensome manner possible.4
1 The Investment Company Institute is the national association of U.S. investment companies, including mutual funds, closed-end funds,
exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and unit investment trusts (UITs). ICI seeks to encourage adherence to high ethical standards, promote
public understanding, and otherwise advance the interests of funds, their shareholders, directors, and advisers. Members of ICI manage
total assets of $12.70 trillion and serve almost 90 million shareholders.
2 See Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Create Exception to Principal Approval Requirements for Certain Filed Sales Material, SEC
Release No. 34-57010 (December 20, 2007), 72 FR 73928 (December 28, 2007) (“Release”).
3 According to the Release, FINRA (then known as NASD) established a Small Firms Rules Impact Task Force in September 2006 to
examine how existing NASD rules impact smaller firms. This proposal is based on a recommendation by that task force.
4 See, e.g., Letter from Paul Schott Stevens, President, Investment Company Institute, to the Honorable Henry M. Paulson, Jr., Secretary
U.S. Department of the Treasury, December 7, 2007, available on the Institute’s website at
http://www.ici.org/statements/cmltr/07_treas_reg_structure_com.html#TopOfPage; and Speech by Paul Schott Stevens, President,
Investment Company Institute “Finding the Right Balance for Mutual Fund Regulation,” 2006 Securities Law Developments
Conference, December 4, 2006, available on the Institute’s website at
http://www.ici.org/statements/remarks/06_seclaw_stevens_spch.html#TopofPage.
Nancy M. Morris
January 18, 2008
Page 2
Under the proposal, a principal at an intermediary firm would no longer be required to approve
investment company sales material if another member has filed the sales material with FINRA’s
Advertising Regulation Department (“Department”) and the Department has issued a review letter
finding that the material appears to be consistent with applicable standards. In addition, any
intermediary firm relying on the exception could not materially alter, or use, the sales material in a
manner that is inconsistent with any conditions stated in the Department’s review letter.
If the proposal is adopted, intermediary firms will be able to use investment company sales
material absent the delay and costs associated with a secondary layer of principal review. Investment
company sales material will continue to be subject to plenary oversight given that it would remain
subject to review and approval by a registered principal at an investment company’s underwriter and
review by the Department.5 Therefore, while investment companies themselves will not experience cost
savings as a result of the proposal, we support the proposed exception from principal review because it is
a less burdensome alternative for intermediary firms, and importantly, one that should not compromise
investor protection.
If you have any questions about our comments or need additional information, please contact
me at (202) 218-3563.
Sincerely,
/s/ Dorothy Donohue
Dorothy M. Donohue
Senior Associate Counsel
cc: Thomas M. Selman, Executive Vice President
Investment Companies/Corporate Financing Regulation
Thomas Pappas, Vice President and Director
Advertising Regulation
Joseph P. Savage, Vice President
Investment Companies Regulation
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
5 See NASD Rules 2210(b)(1) (principal approval) and 2210 (c) (filing with, and review by, Department).
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union